vpejihf3u8rr
vpejihf3u8rr vpejihf3u8rr
  • 16-06-2016
  • Chemistry
contestada

Why it is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted.?

Respuesta :

Jisallyouget
Jisallyouget Jisallyouget
  • 28-06-2016
It is necessary to critique a scientific argument before it is accepted, because the theory needs to be looked at every aspects and angles to test its solidity and validity. This is to make sure the theory is sound and will help any scientific investigations that relate to the theory. 
Answer Link
Аноним Аноним
  • 15-10-2020

Answer:

Catches errors.

Gives confidence in final evidence.

Ensures that conclusions fit evidence.

Makes scientist convince other scientists.

Makes scientist check and justify own work.

Explanation:

Get that 100.

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

list all of the prime numbers less than 20 in numerical order
How does the steepness of the concentration gradient influence the rate of transport?
how many kilograms in 500 grams
Which information can fossils provide? A. the temperature of the earth in the past B. the rate of volcanic activity in the earth's past C. the types of organism
A narrow channel or slab of a mineral that is different from the surrounding rock is called a_______
what determines which plants to grow where
Lead(II) sulfate is precipitated from a mixture of water solutions of potassium sulfate and lead(II) nitrate. Write the word equation and balanced chemical equa
can anyone help me on #8 ? inverse variation or direct variation? and is #9 right I belive it is
Round 3004 to 3 significant digits
Expand (c-2d)⁵ Please explain how can one expands it?