princesslori
princesslori princesslori
  • 18-09-2016
  • History
contestada

Why must historians always be skeptical when they read primary sources documents?

Respuesta :

shadowfall
shadowfall shadowfall
  • 18-09-2016
Because they could be biased and strongly opinionated and also the primary source does not have the benefit of hindsight and is therefore not a valid interpretation and less credible
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

explain and solve this question
Because the cost of a taxi ride increased, Martina decided to start packing a lunch instead of ordering out from a nearby restaurant. Which economic principle
i will give brainliest! What is the value of x in 2(5^x) = 14? a. 0.34 b. 1.15 c. 1.21 d. 219.33
20 points..Can someone help me please? I need to write Two equations that contains fractions in the equations and I need help making them.
Angler’s Edge, worth $12 million, is expected to grow at 5% per year compounded annually for 7 years. Find the future value to the nearest million. $16 million
please help! will give brainliest!
Shauntae is 75 years old. he purchased a single life annuity contract that will pay him $3,000 per month for 10 years. the expected return under the contract is
Beginning in the 1300s, which two cities became the major sea trading ports of Mediterranean and Europe? A. Constantinople and Rome B. Venice and Genoa C. Madri
On average, the moon is 384,400 kilometers from the Earth . How is this distance written in scientific notation?
X2squared +6x+8 factorised