compare zaroff's and rainsford's points of view on the hunt. How does this tension contribute to the moral stakes of the story?

Respuesta :

Answer:

Zaroff thinks that hunting animals is too easy, because they can't reason, which is the exact reason Rainsford feels that hunting animals is acceptable. This tension contributes to the moral stakes of the story by creating an opposing viewpoint that Rainsford will have to ironically forgo if he wishes to survive.

Explanation: